DfT in a bit of common sense shocker

http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100regionalnews/tm_objectid
=14218309%26method=full%26siteid=50061%26page=1%26headline=plan%2dfor%
2dmore%2dspeed%2dcameras%2dis%2dscrapped-name_page.html

http://makeashorterlink.com/?K2A725D38

Plans to increase speed cameras by up to 50% across Merseyside have been
scrapped after the DfT refused the application made by the Merseyside
Road Safety Camera Partnership as many of the sites did not meet the
accident criteria needed to site the cameras there.

I wonder if this is happening up and down the country?

--
Lesley
ZXR400SP
SBS#11[with oak-leaf cluster]
BOTAFOT#101A UKRMHRC#12
BONY#54P BOB#18
Real burds don't take hormones, they rage naturally

Un-cork me to reply

SP wrote
 >http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100regionalnews/tm_objectid
 >=14218309%26method=full%26siteid=50061%26page=1%26headline=plan%2dfor%
 >2dmore%2dspeed%2dcameras%2dis%2dscrapped-name_page.html
 >
 >http://makeashorterlink.com/?K2A725D38
 >
 >Plans to increase speed cameras by up to 50% across Merseyside have been
 >scrapped after the DfT refused the application made by the Merseyside
 >Road Safety Camera Partnership as many of the sites did not meet the
 >accident criteria needed to site the cameras there.
 >
 >I wonder if this is happening up and down the country?

I think Essex abandoned it's plans for more cameras when the Sheriff got
up to 9 points and had a quite word with the Chief constable.




--
steve auvache<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->